Whether respondent violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether respondent on July 5, 2002, transgressed the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States when respondent acted with racial profiling stopped, detained, assaulted kidnapped and harassed petitioner, made an entry, without a warrant, onto private areas of personal premise of petitioner, searched and seized his. property and invaded his privacy, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, then acted with active connivance in the making of the DWLR, left turn violation, No driver’s license false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination clearly sufficient to constitute denial of rights protected by the Equal Protection Clause to deprive respondent of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Whether then on September 21, 2010, Respondent did it again in Greenville County, VA. when Respondent Greenville County, VA sheriff Edward stopped, detained, assaulted, harassed and kidnapped appellant, made an entry without a warrant, onto private areas of : personal premise of Petitioner; searched and seized his property and invaded his privacy, then | acted with active connivance in the making of the FTA, DWLR, warrant for arrest false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination clearly sufficient to constitute denial of rights protected by the Equal Protection Clause and seized and impounded his vehicle without due process of law violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. ii : PROCEEINGS AND RELATED CASES All the parties appear in the caption of the case are on the cover page RELATED CASES Armstrong v. State of Georgia, et al; No. 1:02-CV-02629 -RWS. United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, On March 15, 2022, Appellant seeks leave to appeal a district court’s Order entered March 4, 2004. Armstrong v. State of Georgia, et al, No. 17-90003-D United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided appellant’s case on March 23, 2022. . There is no parent or publicly held company owning 10 % or more of the corporate stock. . TABLE OF CONTENT Questions Presented... I Disclosure statement... Hi : Table Of Conte Opinion DelOW .W.