No. 21-1337

Patrick Gillis v. David Gillis

Lower Court: Oregon
Docketed: 2022-04-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: 14th-amendment court-procedure cross-examination due-process fourteenth-amendment notice notice-requirement opportunity-to-be-heard probate-law standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-06-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether state courts are directly responsible for notifying parties with standing about hearings in cases before them, ensuring all parties have an opportunity to be heard, present objections, and confront adverse witnesses

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In accordance with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, are state courts directly responsible for noticing parties with standing in cases before them about hearings in those cases, thereby ensuring that all parties have an opportunity to be heard, present objections, and confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses? ii |

Docket Entries

2022-06-13
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 9, 2022)

Attorneys

Patrick Gillis
Patrick J. Gillis — Petitioner
Patrick J. Gillis — Petitioner