Claudia A. Barber v. District of Columbia Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether only an expressed prohibition against judicial review can clearly and conclusively overcome the presumption in favor of judicial review of an Agency Decision in the termination of a government employee
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | Whether only an expressed prohibition against | judicial review can clearly and conclusively overcome | the presumption in favor of judicial review of an | Agency Decision in the termination of a government employee. ii | RELATED CASES Administrative Law Judge Claudia A. Barber v. District of Columbia Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges and District of Columbia Office of Administrative Hearings, Case No. | 2016 CA 006576 P(MPA), Superior Court of the | District of Columbia, Judgment entered February 28, | 2019, Claudia A. Barber, Jesse P. Goode, and Caryn Hines v. District of Columbia Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges, Appeal Nos. 19-CV-266, 19-CV-670, 19-CV-1242, Judgment entered September 23, 2021. | Claudia A. Barber, Jesse P. Goode, and Caryn | Hines v. District of Columbia Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges, Appeal Nos. 19-CV-266, 19-CV-670, 19-CV-1242, Order Denying Petition for Rehearing En Banc entered November 16, 2021. ; | | | | | | | ‘ | | |