No. 21-1348

Claudia A. Barber v. District of Columbia Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2022-04-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law agency-decision civil-procedure due-process government-employment judicial-review presumption-of-review statutory-interpretation tenure
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-05-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether only an expressed prohibition against judicial review can clearly and conclusively overcome the presumption in favor of judicial review of an Agency Decision in the termination of a government employee

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | Whether only an expressed prohibition against | judicial review can clearly and conclusively overcome | the presumption in favor of judicial review of an | Agency Decision in the termination of a government employee. ii | RELATED CASES Administrative Law Judge Claudia A. Barber v. District of Columbia Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges and District of Columbia Office of Administrative Hearings, Case No. | 2016 CA 006576 P(MPA), Superior Court of the | District of Columbia, Judgment entered February 28, | 2019, Claudia A. Barber, Jesse P. Goode, and Caryn Hines v. District of Columbia Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges, Appeal Nos. 19-CV-266, 19-CV-670, 19-CV-1242, Judgment entered September 23, 2021. | Claudia A. Barber, Jesse P. Goode, and Caryn | Hines v. District of Columbia Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges, Appeal Nos. 19-CV-266, 19-CV-670, 19-CV-1242, Order Denying Petition for Rehearing En Banc entered November 16, 2021. ; | | | | | | | ‘ | | |

Docket Entries

2022-05-23
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent DC Commission on Selection and Tenure to respond filed.
2022-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 13, 2022)

Attorneys

Claudia A. Barber
Claudia A. Barber — Petitioner
Claudia A. Barber — Petitioner
DC Commission on Selection and Tenure
Stacy Louise AndersonOffice of the Attorney General for D.C., Respondent
Stacy Louise AndersonOffice of the Attorney General for D.C., Respondent