No. 21-1350

Jack Jordan v. Department of Labor, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-procedure-act agency-sanctions constitution constitutional-precedent free-speech freedom-of-speech judicial-review petition precedent strict-scrutiny
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-06-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether federal judges are free to flout and violate the APA, Constitution, and precedent

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, in adjudications under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), federal judges are free to flout and knowingly violate (and help administrative judges flout and knowingly violate) the APA, the U.S. Constitution and this Court’s precedent. 2. Whether agency sanctions for exercising the freedom of speech to criticize agency employees or the right to petition for redress of grievances against agency employees must be subjected to strict scrutiny and supported by clear and convincing evidence of each material fact. ii INDIRECTLY

Docket Entries

2022-06-13
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-05-16
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Labor to respond filed.
2022-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 16, 2022)

Attorneys

Department of Labor
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Jack Jordan
Jack Revels Tucker JordanJack Jordan, Petitioner
Jack Revels Tucker JordanJack Jordan, Petitioner