No. 21-1359
Robert Corliss v. Crossroads Financing, LLC, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration arbitration-waiver california-state-court contract-law contractual-rights court-inconsistency equal-treatment equal-treatment-principle litigation-conduct prejudice prejudice-standard waiver
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Arbitration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether prejudice is required to prove waiver of arbitration rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER “PREJUDICE” TO THE PARTY OPPOSING ARBITRATION IS EVEN A FACTOR, LET ALONE THE DETERMINATIVE FACTOR, A CALIFORNIA STATE COURT ORANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT MUST CONSIDER IN DECIDING WHETHER THE PARTY MOVING TO COMPEL ARBITRATION HAS WAIVED ITS RIGHT TO COMPEL ARBITRATION? 2. WHETHER THIS PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARIIS RELATED TO AND SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE CASE OF MORGAN V. SUNDANCE, INC., CASE NO. 21-328?
Docket Entries
2022-06-13
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-01
Supplemental brief of petitioner Robert Corliss filed. (Distributed)
2022-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent Crossroads Financing, LLC to respond filed.
2022-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 19, 2022)
Attorneys
Crossroads Financing, LLC
Gerald M. Serlin — BENEDON & SERLIN, LLP, Respondent
Robert Corliss
Samuel Kornhauser — Suite 1807, Petitioner