No. 21-1366

Ashwani Sheoran v. Walmart Stores East, LP, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-discipline attorney-discipline circuit-split civil-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-procedure notice-requirements rule-11 show-cause-order
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-06-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 requires the specific offending statements to be listed in the show cause order

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 requires the specific offending statements, if applicable, to be listed in the show cause order to satisfy proper notice requirements under the Due Process Clause. 2. Whether federal appellate courts can use the federal district courts’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 to discipline attorneys when the U. S. Supreme Court holds otherwise. 3. Whether the U. S. Supreme Court should reconcile the circuit split on how attorneys are | disciplined at the federal appellate level to provide consistency and fairness across the circuits. |

Docket Entries

2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-23
Waiver of right of respondent Richard Lockard, MD to respond filed.
2022-04-26
Waiver of right of respondents Wal-Mart Stores East, LP; Toi Walker; Alfred Rodriguez; Doug Henger to respond filed.
2021-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 23, 2022)

Attorneys

Ashwani Sheoran, RPh
Ashwani Sheoran, RPh — Petitioner
Richard Lockard, MD
Robert S. IwreyThe Health Law Partners, P.C., Respondent
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP; Toi Walker; Alfred Rodriguez; Doug Henger
Benjamin Charles MizerJones Day, Respondent