Whether de novo review or clear error is the standard of review applicable to the FAPE-determination under IDEA

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether de novo review or clear error is the standard of review applicable to the question of whether a school district has provided a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to a child with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. 2. In cases arising under the IDEA, whether judicial deference is owed to school district procedures that delay evaluation of students with disabilities or that otherwise violate the IDEA. 3. Whether a retrospective assessment of “some” or “objective” progress, regardless of how minimal, is sufficient to determine that a school district has provided FAPE under this Court’s holding in Endrew F. ex rel. Joseph F. v. Douglas Cty. Sch. Dist. RE-1, 1378. Ct. 988 (2017).