No. 21-1392
Abigail Simon v. Jeremy Howard, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: actus-reus certiorari-review criminal-law criminal-sexual-conduct due-process jury-instructions legal-error sexual-assault standard-of-review trial-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state trial court judge gave erroneous jury instructions on the critical actus reus element of the crime of criminal sexual conduct
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this court should grant certiorari because the state trial court judge gave erroneous jury instructions on the critical actus reus element of the crime of criminal sexual conduct, and this court must clarify the proper scope and utility of jury instructions on the critical actus reus element of the crime charged.
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-04
Waiver of right of respondent Jeremy Howard, Warden to respond filed.
2022-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 31, 2022)
Attorneys
Abigail Simon
Phillip Daniel Comorski — Petitioner
Jeremy Howard, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent