Whether a citizen can be deprived of government services or access for not wearing a mask due to medical inability

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In January 2021, after publicly advocating against covid restrictions, pedophilia and government tyranny, Elizabeth Harding Weinstein, Petitioner, was denied the services of her local government, imprisoned in solitary confinement because Petitioner could not medically tolerate a mask, and remanded there for seven weeks by Defendant Judge Howard T Code. After release, Petitioner filed a Federal 1983 claim Pro Se. Defendant Judge Code retaliated, instantly had Petitioner falsely imprisoned again, absent of criminal charges, and involuntarily committed by judicial order, in clear violation of ; Mental Health Hygiene laws, where she, a woman on no medications her whole life, was gruesomely forced a dangerous litany of medications, by judicial order of related judge Anne E Minihan. Once released, Petitioner was issued an ex parte, ex post facto “order” by related judge Nancy Quinn-Koba, then immediately falsely arrested for alleged violations of the unserved “order” by Defendant Officers, and given new orders by related Judge Stuart A. Halper. Since advocating, Petitioner, who was a sta at home mom for seventeen years, has been denied. by judicial orders: any direct access to her children; access to her home; access to all her finances; access to her belongings, all while being denied due process and access to the court in any case Petitioner is a litigant, including federal courts. Defendants, with the assistance of related Judge Janet C Malone, are now advancing an Article 81 proceeding over Petitioner to take full control over , their legal adversary, all while Petitioner’s competency is self-evident. As a Pro Se litigant, Petitioner has additionally been deprived of equal access to the lower courts. The questions presented are: 1. May a citizen be deprived of government services, or access to a government building, for not wearing a mask, even if the citizen can not medically tolerate a mask? 2. May the government imprison a citizen under the guise of “disorderly conduct” or “obstruction of government interference” for not wearing a mask, even if a citizen can not medically tolerate a mask? 3. May the government deprive a citizen of access to the Court or due process for not wearing a mask, even if the citizen can not medically tolerate a mask? 4. May prison officials punish an inmate for not wearing a mask, even if an inmate can not medically tolerate a mask? 5. May agents of the government violate the Nuremberg Code and coerce prisoners into medical experimentation? . 6. Must scrutiny be applied to judicial or prosecutorial actions to weed out malice, corruption or those who flout clearly established law prior to the application of “judicial immunity”? 7. If scrutiny must not be applied to judicial or prosecutorial actions prior to the application of “judicial immunity,” how does a litigant seek relief from judicial tyranny? : 8. May the Courts have separate processes for : Pro Se litigants which present obstacles to justice : and deny due process? ; 9. Given that most abuse comes from birth families and family members by marriage. are the US. Courts condoning abuse and trafficking by having separate, less transparent Family Court processes? 10. Do legal Guardianships violate the Thirteenth Amendment?