No. 21-1417
Vaughn Hoeflin Standley v. Department of Energy
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-deference agency-interpretation congressional-budget congressional-oversight evidence evidentiary-standard legislative-intent statutory-construction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should not an agency's Congressional budget justifications be considered compelling evidence of the agency's belief?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Should not an agency’s Congressional budget justifications be considered compelling evidence of the agency’s belief? | | an | . | |! ; | | : | i Statement of
Docket Entries
2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-05-27
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Energy to respond filed.
2022-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Department of Energy
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Vaughn Hoeflin Standley
Vaughn H. Standley — Petitioner