No. 21-1425
Darvin Castro Santos v. Craig White, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights correctional-officers due-process excessive-force heck-doctrine heck-v-humphrey prison-disciplinary-proceedings prisoner-rights section-1983
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-06-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Heck v. Humphrey bars a prisoner's excessive-force claim against correctional officers for damages under § 1983 where the claim does not directly attack the outcome of a prison disciplinary proceeding
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), may bar a prisoner’s excessive-force claim against correctional officers for damages under § 1983 where that claim does not directly attack the outcome of a prison disciplinary proceeding. @)
Docket Entries
2022-06-13
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent Craig White, et al. to respond filed.
2022-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 6, 2022)
2022-03-25
Application (21A543) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until May 3, 2022.
2022-03-23
Application (21A543) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 3, 2022 to May 3, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Craig White, et al.
Shae Gary McPhee Jr. — Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent
Darvin Castro Santos