No. 21-1428

Donald L. Blankenship v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)
Tags: brady-v-maryland brady-violation circuit-split criminal-procedure due-diligence due-process exculpatory-evidence prosecutorial-disclosure self-help
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant must show inability to obtain suppressed, exculpatory evidence through independent efforts to establish a Brady violation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, to establish a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), a defendant must show that he could not have obtained the suppressed, exculpatory evidence through his own independent efforts of “self-help” or “due diligence” as the Fourth Circuit and five other circuits have held, or whether the defendant’s failure to uncover the evidence independently is irrelevant, as the remaining six courts of appeals have held.

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-23
Reply of petitioner Donald L. Blankenship filed. (Distributed)
2022-08-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-06-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 8, 2022.
2022-06-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 8, 2022 to August 8, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 8, 2022.
2022-06-06
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
2022-06-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 8, 2022 to July 8, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 8, 2022)

Attorneys

Donald L. Blankenship
Benjamin L. HatchMcGuireWoods LLP, Petitioner
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Barry J. PollackKramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Amicus
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent