No. 21-1429

Zhang Jingrong, et al. v. Chinese Anti-Cult World Alliance, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (4) Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law first-amendment free-speech legislative-history place-of-worship religious-discrimination religious-freedom statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Related Cases: 21-1556 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the statutory text and First Amendment permit FACEA's protections from violence at a 'place of religious worship' to apply only to places religious adherents collectively recognize or religious leadership designates as a place primarily to gather for or to hold religious worship activities

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACEA) prohibits violence against persons exercising their right to religious freedom at a “place of religious worship.” 18 U.S.C. § 248(a)(2). Although FACEA does not modify the term, the Second Circuit held that “place of religious worship” should reach only places “religious adherents collectively recognize or religious leadership designates as a place primarily to gather for or to hold religious worship activities.” The question presented is: Whether the statutory text and First Amendment permit FACEA’s protections from violence at a “place of religious worship” to apply only to places religious adherents collectively recognize or _ religious leadership designates as a place primarily to gather for or to hold religious worship activities.

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-31
Reply of petitioners Zhang Jingrong, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-07-11
Brief of respondents Chinese Anti-Cult World Alliance, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2022-06-09
Brief amicus curiae of Professor John D. Inazu filed.
2022-06-09
Brief amici curiae of West Virginia and 23 Other States filed.
2022-06-09
Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed.
2022-06-06
Brief amicus curiae of First Liberty Institute filed.
2022-06-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 11, 2022.
2022-05-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 9, 2022 to July 11, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 9, 2022)
2022-02-11
Application (21A412) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until May 6, 2022.
2022-02-08
Application (21A412) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 7, 2022 to May 6, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Chinese Anti-Cult World Alliance, Inc., et al.
Tom M. FiniCatafago Fini LLP, Respondent
First Liberty Institute
Kelly J. ShackelfordFirst Liberty Institute, Amicus
Jingrong Zhang, et al.
James A. SonneStanford Law School - Religious Liberty Clinic, Petitioner
Professor John D. Inazu
Nicholas Robert ReavesYale Law School Free Exercise Clinic, Amicus
State of West Virginia and 23 Other States
Lindsay Sara SeeOffice of the West Virginia Attorney General, Amicus
The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty
Eric Christopher RassbachThe Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Amicus