No. 21-1442

In Re Adriano Kruel Budri

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-05-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appellate-procedure brief-dismissal civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fifth-circuit judicial-discretion pro-se pro-se-litigation timely-filing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit err by dismissing for want of prosecution a pending Appellant's Opening Brief filed in a timely manner on 01/07/2022, and severely harming the constitutional rights of the Appellant as Pro Se and to remediate the default in a timely manner found?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Panel of the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“Fifth Circuit”) err by dismissing for want to prosecution a pending Appellant’s Opening Brief filed in a timely manner on 01/07/2022, and severely harming the constitutional rights of the Appellant as Pro Se . and to remediate the default in a timely manner found?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-15
Brief of respondent FirstFleet, Inc. in opposition filed.
2022-05-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due June 15, 2022)

Attorneys

FirstFleet, Inc.
Charles Eric StevensLittler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
Charles Eric StevensLittler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
In Re Adriano Kruel Budri
Adriano Kruel Budri — Petitioner
Adriano Kruel Budri — Petitioner