Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether considering the strong presumption of jurisdiction to review agency action repeatedly recognized by this Court, 8 U.S.C. §1155 and 8 U.S.C. §1252(a)(2)(B) (ii) should be construed to foreclose all judicial review of the revocation of an approved immigrant preference petition when denial of the petition would be subject to judicial review and revocation is governed by established legal standards?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether considering the strong presumption of jurisdiction to review agency action repeatedly recognized by this Court, 8 U.S.C. §1155 and 8 U.S.C. §1252(a)(2)(B) (ii) should be construed to foreclose all judicial review of the revocation of an approved immigrant preference petition when denial of the petition would be subject to judicial review and revocation is governed by established legal standards? i RELATED CASES The Razi School v. Cissna, No. 18-cv-6512, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Judgment entered February 17, 2021. Nouritajer v. Jaddou, No. 21-632, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Judgment entered November 15, 2021.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-11-01
Reply of petitioners Simin Nouritajer, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-10-17
Brief of respondents Ur M. Jaddou, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-09-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 17, 2022.
2022-09-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 16, 2022 to October 17, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 16, 2022.
2022-08-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 17, 2022 to September 16, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 17, 2022.
2022-07-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2022 to August 17, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 18, 2022.
2022-05-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 16, 2022 to July 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 16, 2022)