No. 21-1451
Elile Adams v. Raymond G. Dodge, Jr., Chief Judge, Tribal Court of the Nooksack, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: bad-faith-prosecution civil-procedure civil-rights court-remedies due-process exhaustion exhaustion-doctrine federal-plaintiffs habeas habeas-petition pleading-standard standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Patent Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Patent Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-06-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal plaintiffs seeking to challenge their non-federal prosecution on the basis of bad faith face a heightened pleading standard
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether federal plaintiffs seeking to challenge their non-federal prosecution on the basis of bad faith face a heightened pleading standard. 2. Whether actions taken by the clerk of a non-federal court to impede review of a habeas petition obviate the petitioner’s need to further exhaust remedies in that court.
Docket Entries
2022-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-05-27
Waiver of right of respondent Betty Leathers, Deanna Francis, the Nooksack Indian Tribe, and the Nooksack Tribal Court to respond filed.
2022-05-23
Waiver of right of respondents Raymond G. Dodge, Jr., et al. to respond filed.
2022-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Betty Leathers, Deanna Francis, the Nooksack Indian Tribe, and the Nooksack Tribal Court
Charles N. Hurt Jr. — Nooksack Indian Tribe, Respondent
Elile Adams
Gabriel S. Galanda — Galanda Broadman, PLLC, Petitioner
Raymond G. Dodge, Jr., et al.
Rob Roy Smith — Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Respondent