Are the many millions of disabled veterans, their survivors and dependents entitled to have the VA meet a higher threshold of proof to deny their claims than the 'equipoise' standard?

QUESTION PRESENTED To underscore the uniquely pro-claimant Veterans Administration (“VA”) benefits system, Congress designed the most favorable standard of proof by far in American jurisprudence, the rule. This rule ensures that claimants will prevail on any issue of their disability claim(s) when there is “an approximate balance of the positive and negative evidence.” 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) (1988) (italics added). By inserting the modifier approximate into Section 5107(b), Congress set the standard of positive to negative evidence for granting claims lower than an even balance, and conversely, fixed the quantum of negative evidence for denying them higher than the standard. Nonetheless, over twenty years ago in Ortiz v. Principi, 274 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2001), the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals adopted the standard for denying claims. Jd. at 1365. In the present case, the en banc court affirmed this standard under a different name. The question presented is: Are the many millions of disabled veterans, their survivors and dependents entitled to have the VA meet a higher threshold of proof to deny their claims than the standard?