No. 21-1468
Erickson Meko Campbell v. United States
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review circuit-court civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process judicial-discretion party-presentation sineneng-smith standing sua-sponte
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court of appeals violates the principle of party presentation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a court of appeals violates the principle of party presentation announced in United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (2020), by swa sponte raising an issue that the government abandoned in its appellate briefing and granting relief on that basis.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-10
Reply of petitioner Erickson Meko Campbell filed. (Distributed)
2022-07-22
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-06-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 22, 2022.
2022-06-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 22, 2022 to July 22, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-27
Supplemental brief of petitioner Erickson Meko Campbell filed.
2022-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Erickson Meko Campbell
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent