Sylwia Ewelina Madej Manchanda, et vir v. Andrea Lewis, et al.
DueProcess FirstAmendment Immigration
Does the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe routinely and arbitrarily exercise authority beyond the proposed function and jurisdiction of the court on behalf of Jewish Organized Crime and the open and obvious over representation of Jews in the federal and state judiciary, the legal profession in general, control of the Courts of New York City, both on state and federal level?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, routinely, and arbitrarily . exercise authority beyond the proposed function and jurisdiction of the court on behalf of Jewish Organized Crime and the open and obvious over representation of Jews in the federal and state judiciary, the legal profession in general, control of the Courts of New York City, both on state and federal level? 2. Are statements made in judicial proceedings and governmental investigatory proceedings protected as core political speech under the First Amendment precluding Federal and governmental authorities from punishing the party making the statements without ; due process as required by the Fifth Amendment made . ; applicable to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment? LIST OF ALL PARTIES TO THE | . PROCEEDING IN THE COURT oO .. . as per rule 12. ad 1. Manchanda, et al. v. Lewis et al., 21-1088-cv, -_ ; Order of the United States Court of Appeals for : the Second Circuit. Plaintiffs Rahul D. oo. : ; " Manchanda and Sylwia Manchanda v. .. Defendant Andrea Lewis, Susan Quintana and ve o USCIS Immigration Services. De 2. Manchanda v. Senderoff, 21-1909, Order of the _ . United States Court of Appeals for the Second : Circuit. Plaintiff Rahul D. Manchanda_v. Defendant Douglas Senderoff. , : . 1 | ;