No. 21-1482
Dequantey Maurice Williams v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure evidence fourth-amendment law-enforcement motion-to-suppress plain-view-doctrine probable-cause search-and-seizure vehicle-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States District Court For The Middle District Of North Carolina Erred in Denying Mr. Williams's Motion to Supress evidence related to the State's stop and search of his vehicle?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the United States District Court For The Middle District Of North Carolina Erred in Denying Mr. Williams’s Motion to Supress evidence related to the State’s stop and search of his vehicle? Whether law enforcement’s search of Mr. Williams’s vehicle violated his Fourth Amendment rights? Whether the plain view doctrine properly justified law enforcement’s search of Mr. Williams vehicle?
Docket Entries
2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-05-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 24, 2022)
Attorneys
Dequantey Maurice Williams
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent