No. 21-1491

City of Kent, Washington v. Adrian Jacobo-Hernandez

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2022-05-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-law due-process excessive-fines felony felony-instrumentality forfeiture livelihood-preservation property-forfeiture
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Excessive Fines Clause provides a livelihood preservation protection which can prevent the forfeiture of the instrumentality of a felony?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Excessive Fines Clause provides a livelihood preservation protection which can prevent the forfeiture of the instrumentality of a felony?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
Supplemental brief of petitioner City of Kent filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent Adrian Jacobo-Hernandez to respond filed.
Main Document
2022-05-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 27, 2022)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Adrian Jacobo-Hernandez
John Robert Carpenter — Federal Public Defender, Respondent
John Robert Carpenter — Federal Public Defender, Respondent
City of Kent
Bijan Thomas Hughes — City of Kent - Office of the City Attorney, Petitioner
Bijan Thomas Hughes — City of Kent - Office of the City Attorney, Petitioner