Jimmy Baldea v. City of New York License Division of the NYPD
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Is License Division empowered to deny an unrestricted concealed carry license to a qualified police officer, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 926B (2017), who seeks to apply for such licensing?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : 1. Is License Division empowered to deny an unrestricted concealed carry license to a qualified police officer, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 926B (2017), who seeks to apply for such licensing?. 2. Does License Division’s interpretation and use of 88 RQNY.violate 18 U.S.C. § 926B (2017) by | preventing Baldea, a qualified police officer, from | gaining access to his off-duty handgun? } 3. Did any/all of the following (appellate division, first department; License Division; City of New York Law Department; court of appeals) act unjustly by , denying Baldea an in-person and/or emergency | hearing and/or special consideration in light of : Baldea identifying himself as a qualified police officer ; who faces dangers at work by being unprotected | without his off-duty handgun? , 4. Should the City of New York be required to establish and empower, and should License Division | be mandated to be held accountable to, an independent | civilian Review Board, as opposed to the current | practice of use of an in-house Appeals Unit that | exists within and is staffed by License Division, for | of handgun licenses by License | Division? | | | | ii .