Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 for failure to state a claim

QUESTION PRESENTED Statement by Landlord in an email exhibit 001 | Deal is Approved but being that their money is in India, I need 4 months deposit — 1 month of that will be first month’s rent. | Petitioner feels the law 42 U.S.C. § 1982 is violated, | and Judge Mendoza says no. 42 US Code § 1982 Property rights of Citizens All Citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every state and Territory, as enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, hold, and | convey real or personal property. Honorable Judge Carlos Mendoza and Honorable Magistrate Judge Denial C Irick feel that is not enough to | file a discrimination case, Case 6:18-cv-01647 docket | entry 11 (page 5/6) dated 12/06/2018 (Exhibit 002). | Apparently, that email is a discriminating statement | about the Plaintiff being from India and insisting more money for security deposit, which allegedly violates the rights of the Plaintiff to enjoy the same entitlements as any other US citizen, giving rise to a claimed liability under § 1982. There is no other mention of any allegedly discriminatory conduct or violation of federal law. | Plaintiffs’ sole allegation that a Defendant required | four months’ deposit because Plaintiffs’ Case 6:18-cv| 01647-CEM-DCI Document 11 Filed 12/06/18 Page 5 of | 13 Page ID 92 6 money was in India is not sufficient to Be , ii QUESTION PRESENTED Continued state a cause of action under § 1982. Ramchandani v. Sanghrajka, No. 2018 US. Dist. LEXIS 160189, at *6-8 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2018). | | iii PARTIES TO THE CASE/