No. 21-1500

Residents of Gordon Plaza, Inc. v. LaToya Cantrell, in Her Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-31
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: cercla citizen-suit comprehensive-environmental-response-compensation- consent-decree environmental-law epa-consent-decree operation-and-maintenance rcra removal-action resource-conservation-and-recovery-act
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a liable party's operation and maintenance activities pursuant to an EPA consent decree constitute 'conducting a removal action' so as to bar a citizen suit to abate an imminent and substantial endangerment under 42 U.S.C. § 6972 after EPA has declared all response actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act to be complete

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Fifth Circuit ruled that homeowners on a toxic landfill are precluded from suing under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 US.C. § 6972, to protect their health and property, due to a liable party’s minimal operation and maintenance activities, such as mowing vegetation, performed pursuant to a 2008 consent decree under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-75. RCRA precludes citizen abatement actions when “a responsible party is diligently conducting a removal action” pursuant to a consent decree. 42 U.S.C. § 6972(b)(2)(B)(iv). The Fifth Circuit interpreted “removal action” to include New Orleans’ minimal longterm operation and maintenance activities, effectively foreclosing homeowners’ ability to seek abatement of ongoing risks—decades after EPA declared all response complete. See National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 69 Fed. Reg. 47068, 47071 (Aug. 4, 2004). Response actions include removal actions, which are “short-term cleanup” measures, and remedial actions, which are “measures to achieve a ‘permanent remedy.’” Exxon Corp. v. Hunt, 475 U.S. 355, 360 (1986) (citing 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(23), (24)). Once those activities are complete, CERCLA provides for “operation and maintenance.” 42 U.S.C. § 9604(c)(6). The question presented is: Whether a liable party’s operation and maintenance activities pursuant to an EPA consent decree constitute ii QUESTION PRESENTED—Continued “conducting a removal action” so as to bar a citizen suit to abate an imminent and substantial endangerment under 42 U.S.C. § 6972 after EPA has declared all response actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act to be complete.

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-12
Reply of petitioner Residents of Gordon Plaza, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2022-06-29
Brief of respondent LaToya Cantrell, in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of New Orleans, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-05-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 30, 2022)

Attorneys

LaToya Cantrell, in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of New Orleans, et al.
Michael James LaughlinLaw Department, City of New Orleans, Respondent
Residents of Gordon Plaza, Inc.
Lisa W JordanTulane Environmental Law Clinic, Petitioner