No. 21-1530

Martine Bernard v. Christopher Hodyl

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2022-06-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: article-iii-standing civil-rights court-ordered-therapy due-process fourteenth-amendment personal-autonomy privilege professional-ethics standing therapist-privilege therapy-requirement
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the federally and state recognized privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond and personal autonomy under the Fourteenth Amendment preclude a state district court from requiring therapy, progress reports, and a restricted therapist list

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . . Whether the federally and state recognized : privilege in Jaffee v. ‘ : Redmond and personal autonomy under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution preclude a state district court . from requiring that a mentally competent : ; party seek therapy to change their belief, for the treating therapist to provide “progress reports”, for the party to be restricted to the district court’s own list of therapists after 150 therapists declined the case and one therapist , informed the district court that the ternis in : , the order violate the party’s privilege and the American . ; Psychological Association (APA) Codes of ; : ; Ethics 3.05; and whether Petitioner has-article III standing to challenge such a court order? . : i

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Martine Bernard
Martine Bernard — Petitioner
Martine Bernard — Petitioner