Martine Bernard v. Christopher Hodyl
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the federally and state recognized privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond and personal autonomy under the Fourteenth Amendment preclude a state district court from requiring therapy, progress reports, and a restricted therapist list
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . . Whether the federally and state recognized : privilege in Jaffee v. ‘ : Redmond and personal autonomy under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution preclude a state district court . from requiring that a mentally competent : ; party seek therapy to change their belief, for the treating therapist to provide “progress reports”, for the party to be restricted to the district court’s own list of therapists after 150 therapists declined the case and one therapist , informed the district court that the ternis in : , the order violate the party’s privilege and the American . ; Psychological Association (APA) Codes of ; : ; Ethics 3.05; and whether Petitioner has-article III standing to challenge such a court order? . : i