Whether a cy pres award that provides no direct relief or benefit to class members comports with Rule 23(e)

question presented here is identical to the one that the Court granted in Gaos but left unresolved; the second is an important issue that arises in class actions generally. 1. Whether, or in what circumstances, a cy pres award that provides no direct relief or benefit to class members comports with the Rule 23(e) requirement that a settlement binding class members must be “fair, reasonable, and adequate.” 2. Whether Rule 23(b)(3) permits certification of a class where the district court has found that class members cannot be ascertained or even self-identify without an individualized “difficult and expensive” inquiry.