No. 21-1536

Arvind Gupta v. Headstrong, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure contract-law employment-law h1b-visa immigration-law nonimmigrant-worker settlement-agreement wage-and-hour wage-hour-violations
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether employers can have a legally enforceable private settlement and release agreement with the nonimmigrant worker in violation of INA requirements

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question I: Whether employers can have a legally : . enforceable private settlement and release agreement with the nonimmigrant worker in ~ violation of ‘INA’ requirements. ; Question 2: In the absence of any complaint, claim or counterclaim by employer for breach of contract by nonimmigrant worker, did the district court properly award attorneys’ fees to the employer. an Question 3: , ; Did Headstrong, Inc. comply with required wage obligations for the period of violations found by the Administrator (Wage-Hour) and the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). : ii

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 7, 2022)
2022-03-23
Application (21A534) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 5, 2022.
2021-03-18
Application (21A534) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 6, 2022 to June 5, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Arvin Gupta
Arvind Gupta — Petitioner
Arvind Gupta — Petitioner
Marty Walsh, Secretary of Labor
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent