No. 21-1539

Spectrum Northeast, LLC, et al. v. Aaron M. Frey, Attorney General of Maine

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2022-06-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: cable-communications-policy-act express-preemption preemption presumption-against-preemption rate-regulation state-and-local-laws state-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Cable Act preempts state and local laws that prevent cable companies from selling their services at their chosen rate for the final month of service

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 generally prohibits states from “regulat[ing] the rates for the provision of cable service” by cable companies, and it deems any state or local laws inconsistent with this prohibition to be “preempted and superseded.” 47 U.S.C. §§ 5438(a)(1)-(2), 556(c). Notwithstanding that ban on rate regulation, states and municipalities have increasingly enacted laws that directly govern the rates cable companies may charge subscribers for the final month of service when the subscriber cancels service in the middle of that month. Here, Maine enacted a statute forbidding cable companies from charging a fixed rate for the final month, and instead requiring such companies to charge a prorated rate. Me. Stat. tit. 30-A, § 3010(1-A) (2021). The questions presented are as follows: 1. Whether the Cable Act preempts state and local laws that prevent cable companies from selling their services at their chosen rate for the final month of service. 2. Whether courts should interpret express preemption clauses according to their plain language, or should instead apply a non-textual presumption against preemption.

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-21
Reply of petitioners Spectrum Northeast, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-02
Brief of respondent Aaron M. Frey, Attorney General of Maine in opposition filed.
2022-11-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 2, 2022.
2022-11-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2022 to December 2, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2022.
2022-10-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 19, 2022 to November 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-19
Response Requested. (Due October 19, 2022)
2022-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-05
Waiver of right of respondent Aaron M. Frey, Attorney General of Maine to respond filed.
2022-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 8, 2022)
2022-04-19
Application (21A619) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until June 6, 2022.
2022-04-14
Application (21A619) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 5, 2022 to June 6, 2022, submitted to Justice Breyer.

Attorneys

Aaron M. Frey, Attorney General of Maine
Paul Edwin SuitterOffice of the Maine Attorney General, Respondent
Spectrum Northeast, LLC, et al.
Roman Martinez VLatham & Watkins, LLP, Petitioner