No. 21-1551
Jamar E. Plunkett v. Dan Sproul
Tags: ambiguity contract-interpretation criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process judicial-interpretation plea-agreement rule-of-lenity statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a plea agreement that is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation must be interpreted in the defendant's favor
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a plea agreement that is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation must be interpreted in the defendant’s favor.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 11, 2022)
2022-04-26
Application (21A645) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until June 8, 2022.
2022-04-22
Application (21A645) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 9, 2022 to June 8, 2022, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Jamar E. Plunkett
Jorge Benjamin Aguinaga — Jones Day, Petitioner