No. 21-1600
Jian-Yun Dong, aka John Dong v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: 28-usc-2461c asset-seizure breach-of-contract contract-breach criminal-forfeiture federal-criminal-law honeycutt-precedent honeycutt-v-united-states ownership-interest personal-gain statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal forfeiture judgment is permitted under Honeycutt v. United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a criminal forfeiture judgment against Petitioner Jian-Yun Dong (“Petitioner”) under 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), is permitted under this Court’s decision in Honeycutt v. United States, 1387S. Ct. 1626 (2017) (“Honeycutt”), where the Petitioner had no ownership interest in, nor personally obtain, the assets ordered forfeited. 2. Whether a criminal conviction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 641 and 1343 can be supported by an indictment alleging that Petitioner’s conduct amounted to breach of contract.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Jian-Yun Dong
Robert Edward Barnes — Barnes law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent