No. 21-1609
Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona v. Paul A. Isaacson, et al.
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying a stay of the injunction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-30
The application for stay (21A222) presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment, and the petition is granted. The September 28, 2021 order of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of <i>Dobbs</i> v. <i>Jackson Women’s Health Organization</i>, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-06-29
Application (21A222) referred to the Court.
2021-12-22
Reply of applicant Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona filed.
2021-12-21
Response to application from respondents Paul Isaacson, et al. filed.
2021-12-15
Response to application (21A222) requested by Justice Kagan, due Tuesday, December 21, 2021, by 5 p.m.
2021-12-10
Application (21A222) for a stay pending appeal, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2021-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed.
Attorneys
Mark Brnovich
Michael Shawn Catlett — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Petitioner
Michael Shawn Catlett — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Petitioner