Mark Lee Williams v. State Bar of Arizona
ERISA DueProcess FourthAmendment
Whether Petitioner was denied his right to notice and Due Process in Arizona bar disciplinary proceedings?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether Petitioner was denied his right to notice and Due Process in Arizona bar disciplinary proceedings? 2. Whether the Arizona Supreme Court and Respondent violated Petitioner’s right to Due Process and notice of the charges by filing and using a bar complaint which conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court? 3. Whether the Arizona Supreme Court and Respondent violated Petitioner’s ; right to Due Process by ignoring the Respondent’s burden to file a complaint that complies with Petitioner’s right to Due Process and shifting that burden which conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court? 4. Whether the Arizona Supreme Court and the Hearing Panel violated Petitioner’s right to notice and Due Process by finding 6 ER violations based on statutes and rules not cited in the Respondent’s defective bar complaint? 5. Whether the Arizona Supreme Court decided negatively what is required of the contends of a bar complaint to satisfy an attorney’s right to notice and Due Process which is an important issue that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court? 6. Whether the Arizona Supreme Court decided negatively what is required of the contents of a bar complaint to satisfy an attorney’s right to notice and Due Process in a way that conflicts with the decisions of the California Supreme Court and Oregon Supreme Court? ae ‘i