Whether the petitioner's equity lawsuit under 42 USC § 1983 seeking declaratory judgment against the respondent is barred by statute

question presented; that Federal judge Ann M. Donnelly is wrong in her Memorandum and Order and Decision on both points that Petitioner’s equity lawsuit brought against the Respondent via Title 42USC Section ii 1983 seeking a declarato.. ,udgment on Petitioner’s claims . ) nst the Respondent is barred by statute. Further, Federal judge Ann M. Donnelly is wrong that the Federal across the board in all circumstances Petitioner’s Title 42 USC Section 1983 equity lawsuit seeking a jury trial for a Declaratory judgment on the Petitioner’s claims against the Respondent and if Declaratory relief/judgment is unavailable then Petitioner _ would seek injunctive relief against the Respondent; P says Federal judge Donnelly is wrong and does not even address or acknowledge the fact that the Petitioner is also bringing.a law of equity against the Respondent and I the Petitioner says I must prevail on those grounds outright and this case must be sent back down for a jury trial by the United States Supreme Court. Petitioner’s next, legal reason why the Circuit Court’s false and fraudulent and perjurious and defamatory Summary Order against the ‘ Petitioner and Federal judge Ann M. Donnelly’s false and Fraudulent Memorandum and Order and Decision and Judgment must be vacated and reversed by the United States Supreme Court on the legal merits is because the Circuit does even address or review the pertinent legal issues and facts with correct findings of fact and conclusions of law and not fantasy and the Circuit Court alleged claim of quote “liberal construction . 2 is total falsehood and criminal fraud simply because the Circuit does not want to deal with the legal issue that I the Petitioner am bring an action at law and in a suit of equity, brought via Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 etc... action where the Petitioner is seeking to obtain a declaratory judgment by a jury trial against the iii Respondent for certainc _ nal acts aforementioned done a “st me, the Petitioner while off the bench over a weekend and then Petitioner seeks to enforce the judgment ~ and the Circuit Court and Federal judge Ann MDonnelly knows that the Petitioner’s—_ Federal Complaint is an equity lawsuit brought in accordance with Title 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983, 1985, and 1988 of The Civil Rights Act specifically the provision seeking _ equitable relief and declaratory judgment and the Respondent has no alleged absolute . immunity or j