No. 21-199

Mohammad Sharif Khalil v. Ur Jaddou, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: asylum-status immigration-law immigration-nationality-act inadmissibility military-training real-id-act retroactive-application terrorist-activities terrorist-organization
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-12-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the INA, as amended by the REAL ID Act, permits the government to retroactively deem a noncitizen inadmissible for receiving military-type training from or on behalf of a group that the United States did not consider a terrorist organization 'at the time' of his training

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) identifies various “terrorist activities” that render a noncitizen inadmissible. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(83)(B). The REAL ID Act of 2005 amended the INA to, among other things, add a ground of inadmissibility for receipt of “military-type training ... from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)).” Jd. § 1182(a) (3)(B)G@)(VIID. No other terrorism-related grounds of inadmissibility under § 1182 include the language “at the time” to describe the conduct at issue. In the early—mid 1980s, Petitioner Mohammad Sharif Khalil fought against the Soviets with the U.S.-backed and trained war-time ally known as Jamiat-i-Islami (Jamiat). Mr. Khalil disclosed his background with Jamiat and was granted asylum in 2000. In its 2019 denial of Mr. Khailil’s application to adjust status, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services claimed that beginning in the late 1980s, Jamiat qualified as an undesignated “Tier III” terrorist organization under § of the INA, as amended by the PATRIOT Act of 2001. The question presented is: Whether the INA, as amended by the REAL ID Act, permits the government to retroactively deem a noncitizen inadmissible for receiving military-type training from or on behalf of a group that the United States did not consider a terrorist organization “at the time” of his training.

Docket Entries

2021-12-13
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-19
Reply of petitioner Mohammad Sharif Khalil filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-09
Brief of respondents Jaddou, Ur, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including November 9, 2021.
2021-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 12, 2021 to November 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 12, 2021.
2021-09-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 10, 2021 to October 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 10, 2021)

Attorneys

Jaddou, Ur, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Mohammad Sharif Khalil
Kathryn Helen BradyConstitutional Law Center for Muslims in America, Petitioner
Kathryn Helen BradyConstitutional Law Center for Muslims in America, Petitioner