No. 21-20
Jack Albert Chappell v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: brady-violation criminal-procedure due-process evidence-disclosure evidence-handling fair-trial government-witness prosecutorial-misconduct witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether prosecutorial misconduct and mishandling of evidence constitutes a Brady violation when the government failed to disclose critical information regarding the drugged and intoxicated state of a government witness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), does prosecutorial misconduct and mishandling of evidence constitute a Brady violation when the Government prosecuting attorney refused to disclose critical information regarding the drugged and intoxicated state of Government witness Leslee Ball and knowingly permitted her to testify at trial. i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-14
Waiver of right of respondent United State of America to respond filed.
2021-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Jack Chappell
Theodore Sandberg — Olson Juntunen Sandberg & Boettner, Petitioner
United State of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent