Lack of subject-matter and personal jurisdiction

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : : The Court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction for the reasons below. Page | 2 age 1. This Court, and all public offices, is defined under FRCP Rule 4(j) as a FOREIGN STATE, and as defined under TITLE 28-JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE The Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976 is a United States law, codified at Title 28, § 1330, 1332, 1391(f), 1441(d), and 1602-161 1, and is being jurisdictionally challenged, and “full disclosure” of the “true” jurisdiction of this Court has been asked but has stayed silent’? 2. Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 15 Statues at Large, For this was passed to remove the people of the united States of America from the federal citizenship under the 14% amendment. Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July 27, 1868? , 3. It is the court’s responsibility to prove it has subject matter jurisdiction, and where a judge arbitrarily claims the court has jurisdiction, he is violating the defendant’s right to due process of the law. It is, in fact, the plaintiff's responsibility to prove, on the record, That jurisdiction exists, and jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, even years later, and even collaterally, as in a private administrative process, as was done herein, It is the petitioner’s right to challenge jurisdiction, and it is the duty to -prove it exist. The respondent herein was given the opportunity (multiple times) to put the facts of jurisdiction on the administrative record, but acquiesced by tacit procuration 7 to the fact that the constitutional and due process violations alleged by the petitioner did now the record before the court? ; Page | 3 4. That it is not the prosecutor’s duty and obligation to provide ALL the facts that establish the court’s jurisdiction, and place them upon the record — even in a collateral attach against jurisdiction? : 5. The Prosecutor(s) has failure to comply with any/all request of jurisdictional issues for the record in which violates the “Accardi Doctrine” in which the U.S. Supreme Court has provided. The prosecutors originally asserted that the Court had personal and subject; matter jurisdiction and no evidentiary documents were presented. Like any other evidence placed on record, all evidence pertaining to lawful jurisdiction can and be inspected by all parties in the case. Shouldn’t they be presented instead of tacit admission? 6. For The Claimant; is “transient foreigner” without legal domicile as defined in [28 USC 1332 (d), 4 USC 110 (d). In the event that the “State” (Legal Fiction) makes a claim against claimant(s) herein declares his “person” to be “stateless person” and outside any/all general jurisdiction of the federal government. [All “stateless persons” fail to be subject to the jurisdiction of any/all courts because domiciled outside of the general jurisdiction of the ; federal government}.