Thomas Rimini v. Department of Labor
DueProcess
1. Should an unopposed default judgement be granted because the Department
of Labor ("DOL ") did not submit the full administrative record to the court
as required by FRAP 17 and the Administrative Procedure Act, or comply
with local rules on the requirement, including while this matter is
administratively active before the DOL and proceeding as 2021-SOX-00020,
irretrievably prejudicing this matter and thwarting a full and fair review?
2. May a Circuit Court declare as res judicata a matter currently proceeding /
before the Supreme Court and the Department of Labor?
3. Did the Circuit Court lack subject matter jurisdiction to rule while an earlierfiled Sarbanes-Oxley matter with identical causes of action is not
administratively exhausted before the Department of Labor?
Should an unopposed default judgement be granted because the Department of Labor did not submit the full administrative record to the court as required by FRAP 17 and the Administrative Procedure Act, or comply with local rules on the requirement, including while this matter is administratively active before the DOL and proceeding as 2021-SOX-00020, irretrievably prejudicing this matter and thwarting a full and fair review?