Michael Murphy v. Richard Sarta, et al.
Immigration
WHETHER THE TENNESSEE STATE TRIAL AND APPELLATE COURTS ARE USING A CONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE STATUTE TO DENY CITIZENS SIMILARLY SITUATED HEREIN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD AND TO VIOLATE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WITHOUT RECOURSE AND THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL,THEREBY THWARTING JURISDICTION AND BLOCKING THEIR ACCESS TO JUSTICE
No question identified. : . { L} t « . QUESTIONYS) PRESENTED | WHETHER THE TENNESSEE STATE TRIAL AND APPELLATE COURTS ARE USING : A CONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE 59.04, TO DENY CITIZENS SIMILARLY SITUATED HEREIN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD AND TO VIOLATE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS WITHOUT RECOURSE AND THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL,THEREBY THWARTING JURISDICTION AND BLOCKING THEIR ACCESS TO JUSTICE. , | | | | | | | : i |