No. 21-249

Probir Kumar Bondyopadhyay v. United States

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process federal-claims government-taking invention-compensation national-defense patent patent-rights standing takings
Key Terms:
Patent
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Jeffersonian claim of an original creature of the U.S. Constitution against the United States under Article 1 Section 8 Clause 8 arising out of unauthorized and intentional use of a patented U.S. invention vital for U.S. National Defense should be recognized and affirmed

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ! The question before the Honorable U.S. Supreme Court is on the recognition and affirmation of the Jeffersonian claim of an original creature mo, of the U.S. Constitution against the United States under Article 1 Section 8 Clause 8 arising out of admittedly unauthorized and intentional use (over a | continuous period of 12 years 7 months and 16 days) of a patented U.S. invention vital for U.S. National Defense on which the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (USCFC) and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued no judgment (even under CAFC Rule 40 and CAFC Rule 35). [

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Probir Kumar Bondyopadhyay
Probir Kumar Bondyopadhyay — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent