Whether the Trial Judge erred in not having an on-the-record colloquy with the defendant regarding the right to testify

Questions Presented 1. Whether or not the Trial Judge erred in not having an on-therecord colloquy with the defendant outside the presence of the jury to enquire if the defendant wished to exercise his/her right to testify, or wished to affirmatively exercise a waiver that Constitutional right? 2. Whether or not the refusal of a defendant's counsel of record to file for a Speedy Trial Violation and Pre-Indictment Delay Motions, while instructed to do so, precludes the defendant from asserting his right to file the Speedy Trial Violation Motion and constitutes a Constitutional Violation of his right to Due Process? 3. Whether the defendant’s Due Process and Speedy Trial rights were violated when the government return two(2) indictments in two(2) separate Federal District Courts for the same underlying offense, at the same time using a summary of the Grand Jury transcript from the first indictment, testimony from the same witnesses, and informing the Grand Jury in both Districts as to the contents of proffers between the defendant and the government? ii 4. Whether or not the defendant’s Due Process rights were violated by the government filing and returning an indictment from one Federal District Court to another Federal District Court to avoid Court ordered Brady material by the Western District Court of New York regarding searches of the defendant’s airplanes coming to the United . States from Guyana via Puerto Rico, and whether the government committed a major Speedy Trial Violation by failing to file continuances for over 334 days while the defendant was incarcerated in the Western District of New York, and broadening the offense charged within the superseding indictment to gain a tactical advantage of the accused? 5. Whether or not the Trial Judge erred by allowing the federal government to detain a criminal defendant for over two(2) years without an indictment and holding a defendant from arrest to trial for over forty one(41) months violation the defendant’s rights to Speedy Trial and depriving the defendant form Due Process of Law? _ 6. Whether it was a fatal error for the Trial Judge to allow the jury to consider testimony from the arresting agent and narcotics iii evidence that was seized after the conspiracy as charged in the . indictment had ended severely causing prejudice to the defendant’s case? iv List of All Proceedings Judgment of conviction of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, District Court No. 3-17-cr-00343-1, District Judge: Honorable Anne E. Thompson , Vv