Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the dormant commerce clause may be used to invalidate the application of a state's neutral, non-discriminatory tolling statute to defeat the enforcement of a former resident's stipulated judgment where there is no showing of any burden on or discrimination against interstate commerce
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the dormant commerce clause may be used to invalidate the application of a state's neutral, non-discriminatory tolling statute to defeat the enforcement of a former resident's stipulated judgment where there is no showing of any burden on or discrimination against interstate commerce. 2. Whether the dormant commerce clause applies to a state statute with no intended or demonstrated effect on interstate commerce.
2022-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2022-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-10
Reply of petitioner Arrow Highway Steel, Inc. filed.
2021-10-27
Brief of respondent Robert Dubin in opposition filed.
2021-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 29, 2021.
2021-09-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 29, 2021 to October 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-30
Response Requested. (Due September 29, 2021)
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-28
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Dubin to respond filed.
2021-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)