No. 21-276

Safehouse v. Department of Justice, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (4)Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: commerce-clause controlled-substances-act federalism felony-statute medical-supervision opioid-crisis overdose-prevention public-health public-health-intervention
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does 21 U.S.C. § 856(a) make it a felony to offer medically supervised consumption services for the purpose of preventing opioid overdose deaths?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In the midst of the opioid and overdose crises ravaging the nation and causing the death of more than 3,214 people over the last three years in the City of Philadelphia, petitioner Safehouse, a Philadelphia non-profit organization, seeks to establish an overdose prevention site that will offer medically supervised consumption services—a public-health intervention employed to prevent overdose deaths by providing immediate access to opioid reversal agents and urgently needed medical care at the time and place they are required, which is at the moment of consumption. A divided panel of the Third Circuit reversed the grant of a declaratory judgment in favor of Safehouse and held that the proposed facility would violate 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(2)—a provision of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that Congress passed to target “crack houses” and “rave parties.” Section 856(a)(2) makes it unlawful (in relevant part) to “manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, ... and knowingly and intentionally ... make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.” The question presented is: Does 21 U.S.C. § 856(a) make it a felony to offer medically supervised consumption services for the purpose of preventing opioid overdose deaths? (i)

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-24
Brief amici curiae of District of Columbia and Ten States filed. (Distributed)
2021-09-24
Brief amici curiae of Fourteen Cities and Counties filed. (Distributed)
2021-09-21
Brief amici curiae of Philadelphia Mayor James Kenney, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-09-17
Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent U.S. Department of Justice, et al. to respond filed.
2021-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2021)

Attorneys

Current and Former Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders, and Former Attorneys General and Department of Justice Officials and Leaders
Daniel SegalHangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Amicus
District of Columbia and Ten States
Loren L. AliKhanD.C. Office of the Attorney General, Amicus
Fourteen Cities and Counties
Catherine Emily StetsonHogan Lovells US LLP, Amicus
Philadelphia Mayor James Kenney and Acting Health Commissioner Cheryl Bettigole
Jane Lovitch IstvanCity of Philadelphia Law Department, Amicus
Safehouse
Ilana Hope EisensteinDLA Piper LLP (US), Petitioner
U.S. Department of Justice, et al.
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent