No. 21-279

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations Ltd. v. Mark Boughton

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: dormant-commerce-clause due-process extraterritorial-effect extraterritorial-regulation federal-preemption indian-commerce private-business-data private-data state-jurisdiction supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Connecticut impermissibly regulates or controls conduct beyond the boundaries of the State in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Connecticut impermissibly regulates or controls conduct beyond the boundaries of the State in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause when, as a condition of allowing a manufacturer’s products to be sold in the state, Connecticut forces the manufacturer to obtain and provide private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors doing no business in Connecticut and having no nexus with Connecticut. 2. Whether Connecticut violates Due Process protections when it bans a manufacturer’s products from being sold in the state, if the manufacturer fails to obtain and provide to Connecticut private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors relating to their distribution of products in jurisdictions other than Connecticut. 3. Whether Connecticut violates the Supremacy Clause when, as a condition of allowing a manufacturer’s products to be sold in the state, Connecticut forces the manufacturer to obtain and provide private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors who conduct no business in Connecticut nor distribute the manufacturer’s products to, or in, Connecticut. i

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-17
Reply of petitioner Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-19
Brief of respondent Mark Boughton in opposition filed.
2021-09-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 23, 2021.
2021-09-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2021 to November 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2021)

Attorneys

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.
Kelli Jean KeeganBarnhouse Keegan Solimon & West LLP, Petitioner
Mark Boughton
Joseph James ChambersConnecticut Office of the Attorney General, Respondent