No. 21-282
Brian Russell Turner v. Mississippi
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: arizona-v-youngblood body-camera-footage brady-v-maryland brady-violation due-process evidence-suppression exculpatory-evidence law-enforcement prosecutorial-misconduct youngblood-standard
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court of Mississippi Erred in Denying Petitioner's Claim that the Prosecution Withheld Exculpatory Evidence Pursuant to Brady v. Maryland and Arizona v. Youngblood
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Supreme Court of Mississippi Erred in Denying Petitioner’s Claim that the Prosecution Withheld Exculpatory Evidence Pursuant to Brady v. Maryland and Arizona v. Youngblood.
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent The State of Mississippi to respond filed.
2021-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Brian Russell Turner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
The State of Mississippi