No. 21-289
Randall Winslow v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: access-to-courts certificate-of-merit civil-rights contract-clause due-process equal-protection legal-redress redress right-to-contract standing state-regulation
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Pennsylvania Certificate of Merit Pa.Code Rule 1042.3 comports with equal-justice
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . . Whether Pennsylvania Certificate of Merit Pa.Code Rule 1042.3 comports with EQUAL JUSTICE that the outside of your building ° _ proudly displays. ° | ° _ Whether Pa. Code rule 1042.3 interferes with Section 1778 Right to contract. The purpose of the Contract Clause was to prevent the states from letting the privileged escape obligations. The Certificate of Merit requirement permits the privileged from redress | unless you have tens of thousands of dollars to purchase the ; Certificate of Merit. Whether the Pa. Code Rule 1042.3 denies due process.
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-07
Waiver of right of respondents Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al. to respond filed.
2021-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2021)
Attorneys
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al.; Honorable William Mahon