No. 21-293
Vincent Alphonso Powell v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights competency competency-hearing constitutional-rights due-process forcible-medication mental-health panel-decision precedent standing waiver-of-rights
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the State of Arizona, Superior Court, confront a set of facts that are materially indistinguishable from the decision of this honorable Court in the case of Sell v. United States, 534 U.S. 166 (2003), and nevertheless arrived at a different result?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented _Tntroduction. —Reason For Granting Weis _ Stokementiof Gases Conclusion, — Exhibit CA) = Supporting Facts. Td ex Tahependices)
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. to respond filed.
2021-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)
Attorneys
David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
Kathryn A. Damstra — Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Respondent
Kathryn A. Damstra — Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Respondent