No. 21-294

Rukminesh Mehta v. Maggie Kuhl

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-30
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: case-statement civil-rights constitutional-provisions district-court due-process jurisdiction legal-review standing statutory-provisions
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why is FISC involved in a child custody case in the first place?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : (Phone Number) (202) 250 -142 | \, Why is FISC Mvolued in nn Child Lustedy Case in the First Place ? ol. Why did Fice Remove fiom Rb he View an Order Signed by Mis. (sing ©6dh, Chief Unitid States Distict Sedge of the Onitedl Shades Disteict Cooct foe the. Nbtthem District of (Jest Urginia, an Oldey Signed in Sanvary of Zoro? : 3 “thas Ord Needle for Child Nag ence. Stofecl ty Fisc Coot, the. Rowson the. Order was Reguiced, Ushy Did Fise Reject the Request 2

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Rukminesh Mehta
Rukminesh Mehta — Petitioner
Rukminesh Mehta — Petitioner