No. 21-299
Montgomery County, Maryland v. Yasmin Reyazuddin
Amici (2)Response Waived
Tags: attorney-fees civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-relief legal-standing prevailing-party standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a plaintiff who obtains no judicial relief is a 'prevailing party' entitled to attorney's fees
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a plaintiff who obtains no judicial relief is a “prevailing party” entitled to attorney’s fees. (i) ii RULE 29.6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Montgomery County, Maryland, is a Charter county and a political subdivision of the State of Maryland. As a governmental entity, it has no parent corporation and does not issue stock. iii DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by International Municipal Lawyers Association GRANTED.
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-27
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by International Municipal Lawyers Association. (Distributed)
2021-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent Yasmin Reyazuddin to respond filed.
2021-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)
Attorneys
International Municipal Lawyers Association
Montgomery County, Maryland
Yasmin Reyazuddin
Joseph B. Espo — Brown, Goldstein & Levy, LLP, Respondent
Joseph B. Espo — Brown, Goldstein & Levy, LLP, Respondent