No. 21-30

Cammie L. Marceaux v. Tiffany & Bosco, P.A., et al.

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2021-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection foreclosure-challenge just-compensation mortgage-transfer property property-rights standing takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment FifthAmendment Takings
Latest Conference: 2021-11-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented for review of this Court of last resort. Has the Only Power Enlisted in it to rule upon the Land and the Law’s of this Land that our very own “Constitution Of The United States”, has enacted upon it to Rule in Matters Pertaining to the Rights of the Citizens of The United States to Enact for them. To Protect them when in fact Their Life Their Liberty and or Their Right to Property have been Violated and or Infringed upon. There has been no other Prior States Justices Courts that have yet to act. Based on the Laws of the Land to Act for the Life, Liberty and or the Property BELONGING TO THE Owner Cammie L. Marceaux. 1. The Question Under the Constitution 5" and 14 Amendment Clearly Identifies the Questions Before this court Was Cammie’s Privileges or Immunities of Citizenship in the United States Deprived of Peaceful Enjoyment in her Life her Liberties and the Quiet Enjoyment of her Property? ; 2. Was Cammie Deprived of Equal Protections under the Laws of the Land that was afforded to her Under the Constitution Of The United State and Afforded Judicial Due Process in a Court Of Law? A. Where, a Hearing be set, and Evidence could be presented an expert witness to the Property issues be heard? Under the Constitution in the 14 Amendment of the ‘ United States Constitution does it not state that Property Owners have the Right to Due Process? ; . 3. Inthe taken Clause of the 5" Amendment in the Constitution comes into question here. Cammie’s Property worth $230,000 was taken for $16,000. Was Cammie’s : Property taken for Just Compensation? 4. Would it not be Unconstitutional to Not allow a standing at all in any Court to bring Evidence that Proves a Lack of Standing by a Trustee acting on an invalid Transfer of : Authorizations to act upon a Illegally Deposited Mortgage Note into a Trust 13 Years after the closing date of that Trust? 5. Under The Constitution Of the United States There are protection that only this Court . Grants to a Citizen of the United States on a Property issues that can and was Created to challenge a Trustees Authority that States do not challenge in any other Justice Courts Prior to this authority in which is Enacted Upon in this Court is it not? 6. The Final Question before this Court is again Under the Constitution 5" and 14" _ Amendment The Taken Clause When in Fact Cammie’s Property was being forcefully Sold to a 3rd Party Investor For Lawyers Title agency FF3 LLC. And being forcefully stolen from her after she had bought the Property for $229,000 been the Owner of the Property for 13 years and placed $57,000 Cash Down Paid off a $38,000 Pool and Paid for the property the 13 years and HOA Dues Land : maintenance Pool maintenance and Taxes and Insurance and a mortgage Payment that also added an extreme Flocculating Interest Rate. Then in 2017 The Title Owner Daniel R Sanders July 25"" 2017 Signed over his Rights to Cammie ; of the Interest he had in the Title. That Cammie Was Threatened to sign over her Property Rights based on a TRUST Owed Prior to her Purchase in 2006 was used on Cammie. 7. Cammie was then forced to take $16,000 From the Third Party Investor or face a , Foreclosure. Cammie was charged for legal fees and Foreclosure fees and then her property was forcefully taken for $16,000.00 is That a Fair price to pay Cammie for her Property that was not for sale? That the Owner Daniel R Sanders had her Mortgage serviced for him and he sold Cammie the Property and Never Deposited the Note in the TRUST until 13 years later when they got caught. Is this Not an Illegally conducted Seizer of Cammie’s Property by Force?

Docket Entries

2021-11-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-10-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-12
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-03
Waiver of right of respondent Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. to respond filed.
2021-07-30
Waiver of right of respondents Fidelity National Title Agency, Inc. and Lawyers Title Agency to respond filed.
2021-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Cammie Marceaux
Cammie L. Marceaux — Petitioner
Fidelity National Title Agency, Inc. and Lawyers Title Agency
Brian J. CosperFidelity National Law Group, Respondent
Tiffany & Bosco, P.A., et al.
Daniel R. Sanders — Respondent