Whether state courts violated Petitioner's federal rights by removing her own property without notice and due process

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW _——— Respondent sought injunction against Petitioner seeking to void their contract that contains their constitutionally and federally protected property and personal rights and seeking to restrain Petitioner from physical presence, from speech, and from association in the company they co-own, seeking to remove $2.3M loan Petitioner borrowed per IRS code from Petitioner’s own fund that was stored at the company. Petitioner sough Declaratory Judgement to determine whether the contract is enforceable after Respondent resigned and sought injunctive relief against Respondent to prevent him from interfering with the company management. Circuit Judge denied Petitioner's pleadings, ruled Petitioner become a minority owner after removing 2% of her ownership without notice and without due process and granted Respondent’s injunctions against Petitioner. Supreme : Court of Virginia affirmed and ruled, in one paragraph containing 4 lines of 49 word, that there is no error in the lower court’s ruling. The questions presented are: 1. Whether state courts violated Petitioner’s federal rights by removing her own property of 2% company ownership and $2.3M cash without notice and due process, without right to equal protection and substantive due process. . 2. Whether state courts erred in denying due process for declaratory judgement relief and for removing contract that is based on state laws and protected by federal law. ii 3. Whether state courts violated Petitioner's 14% and 1st Amendment rights by restraining Petitioner’s freedom of speech, movement and associations, and discriminating her in her workplace. 4. Whether the state supreme court violated Petitioner’s constitutional rights, equal protection right and right to due process by affirming lower court decision and rule by merit that there is no error in lower court’s decision without offering any opinion. iii RELATED CASES!234 Alice Guan (Yue Guan) v. Bing Ran, CL07003662, Alexandria City Circuit Court, Judgement Entered May 22, 2019. Alice Guan (Yue Guan) v. Bing Ran, Case 200995, Supreme Court of Virginia, Judgement Entered January 11, 2021, Petition for Rehearing En Banc field on January 25, 2021, Order Denying Petition for Rehearing Entered March 26, 2021. 1 A case relating to individuals’, state officials’ and organizations’ bribery (which conducts were revealed in December 2019 in Protorae Law PLLC office space in Tysons Corner, VA) and other wrongful conducts and seeking relief from those conducts was filed in the IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, Civil Case No. 1:21-CV-752RDA-TCB, DEFENDANTS GARY BELL, SERGEY KATSENELENBOGEN AND JEN KIM, the Honorable James C. Clark, Judge of the Alexandria Circuit Court; the Alexandria Circuit Court; the Honorable Donald W. Lemons, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia; the Honorable Cleo E. Powell, the Honorable William C. Mims, the Honorable Stephen R. McCullough, and the Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn, Justices of the Supreme Court of Virginia; the Honorable. Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr., the Honorable Leroy F. Millette, Jr., and the Honorable Charles S. Russell, Senior Justices of the Supreme Court of Virginia; and the Supreme Court of Virginia sought motions to dismiss. Proposed responses in opposition to motions to dismiss are in the